One of the more fascinating issues in the
multifaceted composition of the Holocaust narrative is the resistance movement
in Nazi Germany. Popular tropes of
resistance against the Nazis are commonly depicted in Hollywood movies such as Defiance and Inglorious Bastards, the latter in which beautiful movie theater
owners conspire with brave Americans to eliminate the entire Nazi
leadership. While these imaginations of
the resistance sometimes exaggerate, they still help bring our attention to the
true models of resistance such as the White Rose and Sophie Scholl. What makes it so fascinating
is the challenge to answer the question of, “what is resistance????”
Digging deeper into the meaning of this word
in the context of the Holocaust, the true meaning of resistance is much murkier. For example, what is the difference between
resistance, and opposition? It is really
resistance if one harbored resentment against the Nazis and nothing more? Is that on the same level as an organized
movement such as the ghetto uprising in Warsaw or in the death camps at
Treblinka and Sobibor, where conditions were so bad that the “immediacy and current
threats (the costs of inaction) [were] perceived as greater than repressive
threats (the costs of action) and thus armed resistance occurred” (Maher 255)? These
are the questions we must ask ourselves in an evaluation of resistance and
opposition, and historians have agreed that there is a sliding scale between
the two. For our purposes, we will use
the definition laid out for us by Matthew Stibbe, to create a “distinction
between ‘resistance’—defined as politically organized action aimed that the
overthrow of the National Socialist system and
‘opposition’—defined as any type of behavior that was intentional
non-conformist or that showed contempt for the Nazi regime and its policies”
(Stibbe 132). One can quickly begin to understand the complexity of this
lexical dilemma but if we understand the difference between the two, a more
complete picture of the anti-Nazi movement will emerge.
To add an even deeper level of
understanding and controversy to this topic is the consideration of the
resistance from a gendered perspective. This
may seem inconsequential to some but women actually have a rich history within
the resistance movement that stretched from the very beginning of the Nazi
Regime in 1933 to the end in 1945. In
this narrative, the same questions regarding resistance and opposition emerge
from the larger narrative of the resistance movement. Are the actions of opposition such as a man
giving Ruth Kluger an orange in her book Still
Alive, or Frau Haferkamp from Alison Owing’s interview’s giving food to
Jewish POW the same as Sophie Scholl's proliferation of anti-Nazi
propaganda? What is the difference between true resistance or requisite actions
to feel better about not doing more to help? In this presentation, we will show many
different facets of the women’s resistance movement as a part of the larger resistance against the
Nazi regime. It is impossible to come up with a grand, unifying narrative for
the resistance. Thus we will provide a
categorical understanding of opposition and resistance in their many
forms. We will provide information in
several sections: organized movements such as the White Rose and Red Orchestra,
opposition in everyday life and in the household, and resistance in
concentration and death camps.
No comments:
Post a Comment